ApronSeal™ Double Skirting

Martin® ApronSeal™ Double Skirting provides dual-seal efficiency with a single, one-piece sealing strip for any troughing angle to prevent the escape of fines and dust. ApronSeal™ Double Skirting uses a patented design that features a reversible elastomer strip to provide a second wear life. Optional quick-release clamps are available.

Features and Benefits:

  • Provides effective sealing on higher speed belt.
  • Offers dual life - dual sealing system in a one-piece construction.
  • EPDM 70 durometer rubber composite offers good and low-abrasion index characteristics.
  • Up to 300 feet (76 m). No splices required even in long applications.
  • Applicable on 0°, 20°, 35° and 45° Troughing Angles.
  • A special version for ATEX zones is available on request.

Our technicians and engineers are available to provide expert advice and assistance on this product and all of your bulk material handling questions and problems. Please contact us today and let us help!

Resources

Brochure - Transfer Point Solutions Download
Tech Data Sheet - Skirting Selection Guide Download
Tech Data Sheet - ApronSeal™ Double Skirting Download
Operator Manual - ApronSeal™ Double Skirting Download

View Additional Resources

We Solved Their Problems!
Let us help you solve yours as well. All products and services provided by Martin Engineering carry our Absolutely No Excuses Guarantee. If we don't solve your problem, we will fully refund your money or provide a different solution for you. Period.
Filtrating Dust At Environmentally-Conscious Coal-Fired Power Plant
Orlando Utilities Commission – Stanton Energy Center (SEC) wanted to increase safety by limiting dust and spillage from one of its principal conveyors. Engineers wanted to reduce airborne particles, eliminate a potential source of trips and falls, and reduce clean-up and maintenance time, allowing critical manpower to be utilized elsewhere.
Read Case Study
Paper Plant Having Trouble With Fugitive Material
The release of airborne dust can cause health concerns and create negative attention from regulatory agencies. Any material that spills off the conveyor is a loss - loss in material, profit and efficiency. The spillage also creates the need for manual cleanup which takes man-hours and is a dangerous task - putting workers in harm's way.
Read Case Study
Transportation Company Needed Solution To Coal Dust
Aurora Energy Services needed to increase the flow of coal through the shiploader at its Port of Seward terminal. But transfer chutes on the shiploader choked at rates above 750 mtph, which limited loading speed and slowed ship-turnaround. Even worse, the escape of coal dust during loading led to concerns from a nearby cruise ship dock and marinas, as well as environmental groups.
Read Case Study
Deteriorating Power Plant Needed Material Handling System Redesign
The coal conveying system at the power plant needed refurbishment. Problems included fugitive material arising as dust and spillage, as well as a general deterioration of the condition and performance of the system. Complicating the project was the plant’s need to remain in operation during the work. The plant would need to run the coal handling system almost every day.
Read Case Study
Power Plant Challenged By Dust, Spillage And Carryback
A coal-fired power plant in India was facing serious problems from dust, spillage and carryback on one of its 60 conveyors, which handles 5,000 tons per hour of bulk material. The condition became so severe that the fugitive material was posing a safety hazard, requiring personnel to work in close proximity to the moving conveyor, creating another potential risk.
Read Case Study
Martin Engineering Offers Dependable Solutions When Others Fail
A mine was experiencing dangerous spillage at the loading zone of its tower mounted conveyor. Despite installing equipment from a previous supplier, workers found that dust filled the tower and chunks of raw material spilled from the transfer chute onto the stairs, creating a potential workplace hazard. Twice a month operations had to be disrupted for 12 to 24 hours, so that a 4 to 5 person team could clean spillage.
Read Case Study